insights

Property vs Pension

Keep up to date with updates from ARD

Investing in property as a retirement strategy has become popular, particularly after the post-financial crisis housing boom, driven by low interest rates and government incentives. Many who ventured into buy-to-let investments instead of traditional pensions benefited from a period of cheap mortgages and rocketing house prices. However, the outlook for buy-to-let may not be as promising, and those considering this path should reassess their options carefully.

The UK’s chronic housing shortage supports continued house price growth due to high demand and limited supply. However, the significant rise in interest rates over the past two and a half years has made property purchases far more expensive, reducing rental income and profitability for buy-to-let investors. This higher cost of borrowing poses a substantial challenge to those relying on property for retirement income.

Moreover, recent tax changes have further eroded the attractiveness of buy-to-let investments. An additional 3% stamp duty surcharge now applies to second property purchases, and the tax treatment of rental income has become less favorable. Previously, higher and additional rate taxpayers could offset mortgage payments against their tax bills, saving 40% or 45% in taxes. Now, this relief is capped at just 20%, significantly reducing the financial benefits of buy-to-let investments.

Beyond these financial considerations, property ownership comes with various costs that can erode returns. Legal fees, survey costs, stamp duty, ongoing maintenance, repairs, letting fees, landlord insurance, and periods without tenants all diminish rental income. These expenses, combined with mortgage interest, can make buy-to-let less lucrative than anticipated. You should also be prepared for hassle. Being a landlord is not easy or popular. You can pay an agent to take care of some of the day-to-day problems but you will still be left with key decisions to make, and agency fees eat away more of your return.

Pensions offer several advantages that property investments lack. Employers are required by law to contribute to employee pensions, often matching employee contributions, effectively doubling the investment. Tax relief on pension contributions further enhances their appeal, with basic, higher, and additional rate taxpayers enjoying significant cost savings. Pension investments grow free from income and capital gains taxes, and 25% of the pension can be withdrawn tax-free at retirement.

Pensions also provide greater flexibility in generating retirement income. Unlike property, which cannot be partially liquidated, pension investments can ‘drawn down’ incrementally to meet income needs. While property can play a role in retirement planning, pensions and ISAs usually offer steady returns, lower costs, and fewer risks, making them a preferable choice for most individuals. If considering buy-to-let, it’s crucial to thoroughly understand all associated risks, costs, and taxes before proceeding.

a.r.d Consultancy

Recent insight

Blog
Trump, The Fed and The Markets
Market Commentary
Market Commentary - October 2024
Blog
Property vs Pension